 |
Publisher: Peytchinski, Gospodin Iliev
ISSN: 1312 773X (Online)
Issue: 2013, vol. 19, book 4
Subject Collection: Oral and Dental Medicine
Pages: 396-400
DOI: 10.5272/jimab.2013194.396
Published online: 16 October 2013
J of IMAB 2013; 19(4):396-400
RESTORATION OF ENDODONTICALLY TREATED POSTERIOR TEETH WITH DIRECT AND INDIRECT COMPOSITE – 6-MONTH RESULTS
Stela Nicheva 
, Ivan Filipov,
Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
ABSTRACT:
Aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical performance of direct and indirect composite restorations in endodontically treated posterior teeth for an observation period of 6 months. The study included 65 patients and 126 composite resin restorations - 41 direct (SDR, Ceram X Mono/ Dentsply) and 85 onlays (In:Joy, Dentsply). At baseline and at 6 months they were evaluated using modified USPHS - criteria. Statistical analysis was performed using the Pearson Chi square test and SPSS v.19. There was no statistically significant difference between the results obtained at baseline and after 6 months for both materials (P>.05) The direct and indirect composites demonstrated excellent and promising clinical performance in endodontically treated posterior teeth over evaluation period of 6 months.
Key words: composite; restorations; endodontically treated teeth;
- Download FULL TEXT /PDF 557 KB/
Please cite this article as:
Nicheva S, Filipov I. RESTORATION OF ENDODONTICALLY TREATED POSTERIOR TEETH WITH DIRECT AND INDIRECT COMPOSITE – 6-MONTH RESULTS. J of IMAB. 2013; 19(4):396-400. doi: 10.5272/jimab.2013194.396.
Correspondence to: Dr. Stela Nicheva, Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, 3, Hr. Botev Str., 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria; stellaanik@yahoo.com;
REFERENCES:
1. Wagnild G, Muller K. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth. In: Cohen S, Hargreaves KM, eds. Pathways of the pulp. 9th ed. St Louis: Mosby Co, 2006: 786–821.
2. Belli S, Erdemir A, Ozcopur M, Eskitascioglu G. The effect of fiber insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite. Int Endod J. 2005 Feb;38(2):73–80. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
3. Kishen А. Mechanisms and risk factors for fracture predilection in endodontically treated teeth. Endod Top. 2006;13:57–83.
4. Yamada Y, Tsubota Y, Fukushima S. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Int J Prosthodont. 2004; 17:94–8.
5. Mohammadi N, Kahnamoii MA, Yeganeh PK, Navimipour EJ. Effect of fiber post and cusp coverage on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars directly restored with composite resin. J Endod. 2009 Oct;35(10):1428-32. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
6. Soares CJ, Soares PV, de Freitas Santos-Filho PC, Castro CG, Magalhaes D, Versluis A. The influence of cavity design and glass fiber posts on biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolars. J Endod. 2008 Aug;34(8):1015–9. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
7. Krejci I, Duc O, Dietschi D, de Campos E. Marginal adaptation, retention and fracture resistance of adhesive composite restorations on devital teeth with and without posts. Oper Dent. 2003 Mar-Apr;28(2):127-35. [PubMed]
8. Deliperi S. Direct fiber-reinforced composite restoration in an endodontically-treated molar: a three-year case report. Oper Dent. 2008 Mar-Apr;33(2):209-14. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
9. Ereifej N, Silikas N, Watts DC. Edge strength of indirect restorative materials. J Dent. 2009 Oct;37(10):799–806. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
10. Jiang W, Bo H, Yongchun G, LongXing N. Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2010 Jan;103(1):6-12. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
11. Shawkat ES, Shortall AC, Addison O, Palin WM. Oxygen inhibition and incremental layer bond strengths of resin composites. Dent Mater. 2009 Nov;25(11):1338-1346. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
12. Harrison JL, de Rijk WG, Simon JF. Resin Cements: A Closer Look at Newly Introduced Cements. Inside Dentistry. 2007 Nov-Dec;3(10). [Full text]
13. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct andindirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent. 2004 Sep-Oct;29(5):481–508. [PubMed]
14. Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Chen HY, Hickel R. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater. 2000 Jan;16(1):33-40. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
15. Siso SH, Hürmüzlü F, Turgut M, Altundaşar E, Serper A, Er K. Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques. Int Endod J. 2007 Mar;40(3):161-8. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
16. Mittal N, Sajjan GS. Fracture Resistance Of Endodontically Treated Premolars By Various Restorative Materials - An In vitro Study. Ind J Den Sci. 2010; 2(6):1-5.
17. Plotino G, Buono L, Grande NM, Lamorgese V, Somma F. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Mar;99(3):225-32. [PubMed] [CrossRef].
Received: 25 August 2013
Published online: 16 October 2013