Journal of IMAB - Annual Proceeding (Scientific Papers)
Publisher: Peytchinski, Gospodin Iliev
ISSN: 1312 773X (Online)
Issue: 2015, vol. 21, issue 2
Subject Area: Medicine - Biology
Pages: 793-796
DOI: 10.5272/jimab.2015212.793
Published online: 14 June 2015

J of IMAB 2015 Apr-Jun;21(2):793-796
ADHESION AND SURFACE GROWTH OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS AND LACTOBACILLUS PLANTARUM ON VARIOUS METALS.
Tsveteslava V. Ignatova-Ivanova Corresponding Autor, Sevginar F. Ibrjam, Ismail E. Ismailov, Valerij Ch. Christov, Radoslav I. Ivanov
Department of Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Shumen, Bulgaria.

ABSTRACT:
Background: One of the major drawbacks in the use of biomedical materials is the occurrence of biomaterial-centered infections. Adhesion of microorganisms to an implant is mediated by their physico-chemical surface properties and the properties of the biomaterial surface itself. Subsequent surface growth of the microorganisms will lead to a mature biofilm and infection, which is difficult to eradicate by antibiotics.
Objective: The purpose of this research is to examine the adhesion in the combined cultivation of  Staphylococcus aureus and the Lactobacillus plantarum probiotic bacterium on the surface of different metals (copper, aluminium, low-carbon steel, and zinc).
Methods: The precise weighing (with an allowance of 0,0001 g) of the metal plates before and after the treatment found a minimum negative change in their weight, which may be caused by reduction resulting from corrosion processes, on one hand, or growth because of the forming of a biofilm, on the other. The structure of the layer over the metal plates was analysed by SEM (scanning electron microscopy) JSM 5510.
Results: The thinnest biofilm for both bacteria was registered on the surface of the copper plate. When a combined culture is used on the surface of the aluminium and the steel plates, the pathogenic bacterium is adhered predominantly. On the zinc plate it is only the probiotic bacterium that adheres.
Conclusion: This is an initial research on this problem of significance for the doctors and it is about to be further examined.

Key words: adhesion, biofilm, Staphylococcus aureus, Lactobacillus plantarum,

- Download FULL TEXT /PDF 1156 KB/
Please cite this article in PubMed Style or AMA (American Medical Association) Style:
Ignatova-Ivanova TV, Ibrjam SF, Ismailov IE, Christov VC, Ivanov RI. Adhesion and surface growth of Staphylococcus aureus and Lactobacillus plantarum on various metals. J of IMAB. 2015 Jan-Mar;21(2):793-796.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5272/jimab.2015212.793

Correspondence to: Tsveteslava V. Ignatova-Ivanova, Department of Biology Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Shumen; 115, Universitetska Str., 9712 Shumen, Bulgaria; E-mail: radi_cvet@abv.bg

REFERENCES:
1. Gottenbos B. The development of antimicrobial biomaterial surfaces. Groningen: s.n., 2001. 120 p.
2. Gristina AG. Biomaterial-centered infection: microbial adhesion versus tissue integration. Science. 1987 Sep 25;237(4822):1588-95. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
3. Dankert J, Hogt AH, Feijen J. Biomedical polymers: Bacterial adhesion, colonization and infection. CRC Critical Reviews in Biocompatibility. 1986; 2:219-301.
4. Denstedt JD, Wollin TA, Reid G. Biomaterials used in urology: current issues of biocompatibility, infection, and encrustation. J Endourol. 1998Dec;12(6):493-500. [PubMed]
5. Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science. 1999May 21;284(5418):1318-22. [PubMed]
6. Gilbert P, Das J, Foley I. Biofilm susceptibility to antimicrobials. Adv Dent Res. 1997 Apr;11(1):160-7. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
7. van Loosdrecht MC, Lyklema J, Norde W, Zehnder AJ. Influence of interfaces on microbial activity. Microbiol Rev. 1990Mar;54(1):75-87.
8. Christensen GD, Baddour LM, Hasty DL, Lowrance JH, Simpson WA.  Microbialand foreign body factors in the pathogenesis of medical device infections. In: Bisno AL, Waldvogel FA, editors. eds. Infections associated with indwelling medical devices. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1989: 27–59.
9. Van Oss CJ. The forces involved in bioadhesion to flat surfaces and particles – their determination and relative roles. Biofouling. 1991; 4(1-3):25-35. [CrossRef]
10. Ignatova-Ivanova Ts., Ivanov R. Exopolysaccharides from Lactic acid Bacteria as Corrosion Inhibitors. Journal of Life Sciences. 2014; 8(12): 940-945.
11. Ignatova-Ivanova Ts, Ivanov R. Study of Biofilm formed by lactic acid bacteria on the surface of mild steel. Journal of Life Sciences. 2014; 8(10): 799-804.
12. Ignatova-Ivanova Ts, Ivanov R. Anticorrosion Effect of Biofilm Forming by Lactobacillus Strains on Metal Surfaces. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science. 2013; 19(2):83-85.
13. Ignatova-Ivanova Ts, Ibrjam S. Ivanov R. Study of the Effect of Lactic Acid Fermentation End Products on the Speed of the Corrosion Process. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2015; 4(4):397-401.
14. Page K, Wilson M, Mordan NJ, Chrzanowski W, Knowles J, Parkin IP. Study of the adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus to coated glass substrates. Journal of Materials Science. 2011 Oct;46 (19): 6355-6363. [CrossRef]
15. Arciola CR, Campoccia D, Speziale P, Montanaro L, Costerton JW. Biofilm formation in Staphylococcus implant infections. A review of molecular mechanisms and implications for biofilm-resistant materials. Biomaterials. 2012 Sep;33(26):5967–5982. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
16. Campoccia D, Montanaro L, Arciola CR. A review of the biomaterials technologies for infection-resistant surfaces. Biomaterials. 2013 Nov;34(34):8533-8554. [PubMed] [CrossRef]..

Received: 24 March 2015
Published online: 14 June 2015

back to Online Journal