head JofIMAB
Journal of IMAB - Annual Proceeding (Scientific Papers)
Publisher: Peytchinski Publishing Ltd.
ISSN: 1312-773X (Online)
Issue: 2020, vol. 26, issue1
Subject Area: Dental Medicine
-
DOI: 10.5272/jimab.2020261.2942
Published online: 25 February 2020

Original article

J of IMAB. 2020 Jan-Mar;26(1):2942-2945
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE FREQUENCY OF TOOTH BRUSHING IN PATIENTS WITH PROSTHETIC RESTORATIONS AND IN HEALTHY CONTROLS
Anna Nenova-Nogalcheva1ORCID logo, Desislava Konstantinova2ORCID logo Corresponding Autoremail, Petia Pechalova3ORCID logo,
1) Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University - Varna, Bulgaria.
2) Department of Dental Materials Science and Propedeutics of Prosthetic Dental Medicine, Medical University - Varna, Bulgaria.
3) Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University - Plovdiv, Bulgaria.

ABSTRACT:
The main criterion for personal oral hygiene is the frequency of daily effective tooth brushing.
The aim of the study is to establish any differences in the frequency of tooth brushing in patients with dental prostheses and in healthy controls.
Materials and methods: The study was based on the informed, voluntary participation of 140 dental patients from the North-East of Bulgaria, who were divided into 2 groups, each comprising 70 individuals: a Group of patients with removable and/or fixed dentures and a Control Group including healthy volunteers without any missing or restored teeth. The patients were further divided into two Age groups: 19 - 32 year-olds (Young Age) and 33 - 90 year-olds (Middle age, Adults and Elderly).
Results: The mean age of the subjects included in the study was43.5 years. The Control Group consisted of 19-year-old adolescents, and the group of patients with prosthetic constructions involved individuals aged 22 - 90 years (mean age 53.14 years, SD = 17.48).The participants in the Control Group tend to perform a more frequent tooth brushing as opposed to those in the Group of patients with dental prostheses (U = 628.500, p = 0.000). Under the age of 32 are 15.70% of the patients with prosthetic constructions who brush their teeth once a day. The highest percentage (60%) of participants who brush their teeth once a day is represented by middle-aged and adult individuals, followed by patients brushing their teeth twice a day who are also of the same age group (24.30%).
Conclusion: The frequency of oral care is poor in patients with a prosthetically restored masticatory apparatus (up to once daily) compared to healthy volunteers.

Keywords: oral hygiene, tooth brushing, dental prosthesis,

pdf - Download FULL TEXT /PDF 492 KB/
Please cite this article as: Nenova-Nogalcheva A, Konstantinova D, Pechalova P. Comparative Study of the Frequency of tooth brushing in patients with prosthetic restorations and in healthy controls. J of IMAB. 2020 Jan-Mar;26(1):2942-2945. DOI: 10.5272/jimab.2020261.2942

Corresponding AutorCorrespondence to: Desislava Konstantinova, Department of Clinic of Prosthetic Dentistry, Medical University – Varna; 84, Tsar Osvoboditel str., Varna 9000 Bulgaria; E-mail: dr.konstantinova@gmail.com

REFERENCES:
1. Shklar G, Carranza F, Williams RC. The historical background of periodontology (1st ed). Chicago, IL, Quintessence Pub Co. 2003; 23-44.
2.Ciancio SG. Chemical Agents: Plaque Control, Calculus Reduction and Treatment of Dentinal Hypersensitivity. Periodontol 2000. 1995 Jun;8:75-86. [PubMed] [Crossref]
3. Jones CG. Chlorhexidine: Is it Still the Gold Standard? Periodontol 2000. 1997 Oct;15:55-62. [PubMed] [Crossref]
4. Darby ML,Walsh M. Dental hygiene theory and practice (1st ed.), Saunders, 1995;4 (2): 99-110
5. Yarde A, Robinson M. The miswak chewing stick: A traditional oral hygiene aid. NDA J. 1996;47:20-1.
6. Fones AC. The origin and history of the dental hygienists. J Dent Hyg. 2013; 87:58-62
7. Bowen D. History of dental hygiene research. J Dent Hyg. 2013; 87:5-22
8. American Dental Hygienists’ Association, Standards for Clinical Dental Hygiene Practice. 2008
9. Abdellatif HM, Burt BA. An Epidemiological Investigation Into the Relative Importance of Age and Oral Hygiene Status as Determinants of Periodontitis. J Dent Res. 1987 Jan;66(1):13-8. [PubMed] [Crossref]
10. Tagge DL, O'Leary TJ, El-Kafrawy AH. The Clinical and Histological Response of Periodontal Pockets to Root Planing and Oral Hygiene. J Periodontol. 1975 Sep;46(9):527-33. [PubMed]  [Crossref]
11. Maruniak J, Clark WB, Walker CB, Magnusson I, Marks RG, Taylor M, et al. The Effect of 3 Mouthrinses on Plaque and Gingivitis Development. J Clin Periodontol. 1992 Jan:19(1):19-23. [PubMed] [Crossref]
13. Smith C. Pigmentation of cosmetics. Manufacturing Chemist, 1981; 52:24.
14. Paranhos HF, Salles AE, Macedo LD, Silva-Lovato CH, Pagnano VO, Watanabe E. Complete denture biofilm after brushing with specific denture paste, neutral soap and artificial saliva. Braz Dent J. 2013; 24(1):47-52.
15.de Souza RF, de Freitas Oliveira Paranhos H, Lovato da Silva CH, Abu-Naba'a L, Fedorowicz Z, Gurgan CA. Interventions for Cleaning Dentures in Adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7;(4), CD007395. [PubMed] [Crossref]
16. Konstantinova D. [Examination of the Masticatory Function in Experimental and Clinical Conditions.] [dissertation]. Medical University – Varna. 2016. 56-64 p. [in Bulgarian].

Received: 10 May 2019
Published online: 25 February 2020

back to Online Journal