 |
Publisher: Peytchinski Publishing Ltd.
ISSN: 1312-773X (Online)
Issue: 2020, vol. 26, issue1
Subject Area: Dental Medicine
-
DOI: 10.5272/jimab.2020261.2946
Published online: 25 February 2020
Original article
J of IMAB. 2020 Jan-Mar;26(1):2946-2955
PROSTHETIC IMPLANT MAP (PIM) – ACCURATE AND CONVENIENT ASSISTANT IN SUCCESSFUL IMPLANT TREATMENT
Neli Nikolova
, Dimitar Filchev,
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University-Sofia, Bulgaria.
ABSTRACT:
Objective: This article presents a prosthetic map of implant dental treatment, which aims to systematize and archive the detailed information concerning the prosthetic aspect of implant treatment.
Material and Methods: A survey about peri-implant soft tissues (PIST) was carried out among 31 dental practitioners experienced in implantology. Opinions were expressed about the significance of their specific characteristics in the creation of the implant supra-structure. A practical test for recognition of specific characteristics was performed by four dentists with a different level of experience in implant-supported prosthodontics, who have been thoroughly informed and instructed how to report the PIST status parameters in 10 implant sites. The analysed results were used as a base for the map criteria.
Result: A prosthetic map was created with the following sections containing: 1) personal data with brief information about the patient, 2) information about the implant, 3) information about peri-implant alveolar bone, 4) information about PIST, 5) information about the planned implant restoration,6) information about follow-up examinations.
Conclusion: The organization and formatting of the map allow very accurate marking of all data important for the implant prosthetic treatment and their follow-up over time. The Prosthetic implant map can be used as a guideline for implant supra-structure planning. From a practical point of view, it is a very convenient way of storing all the necessary information and its subsequent analysis for both clinician and patient.
Keywords: prosthetic implant treatment, peri-implant soft tissue, prosthetic implant map,
- Download FULL TEXT /PDF 2342 KB/
Please cite this article as: Nikolova N, Filchev D. Prosthetic Implant Map (PIM) – Accurate and Convenient Assistant in Successful Implant Treatment. J of IMAB. 2020 Jan-Mar;26(1):2946-2955. DOI: 10.5272/jimab.2020261.2946
Correspondence to: Dr Neli Nikolova, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Medical University-Sofia; 1, G. Sofiiski Blvd., 1431 Sofia, Bulgaria; E-mail: nenik@abv.bg
REFERENCES:
1. Bishti S, Strub JR, Att W. Effect of the implant-abutment interface on peri-implant tissues: a systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand. 2014 Jan;72(1):13-25. [PubMed] [Crossref]
2. Morton D, Chen ST, Martin WC, Levine RA, Buser D. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures re- garding optimizing esthetic outcomes in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29: 216–220. [PubMed] [Crossref]
3. Covani U. Barone A. Cornelini R. Crespi R. Soft Tissue Healing Around Implants Placed Immediately After Tooth Extraction Without Incision: A Clinical Report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004Jul-Aug;19(4):549-53 [PubMed]
4. Priest, G. Predictability of soft tissue form around single tooth implant restorations. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry. 2003; 23: 19–27.
5. Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Lozada JL, Zimmerman G. Facial gingival tissue stability following immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: a 2- to 8-year follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Jan-Feb;26(1):179-87. [PubMed]
6. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI, Lindhe J, Eriksson B, et al. Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fixtures (I). A 3-year longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986 Feb; 15(1):39-52. [PubMed] [Crossref]
7. Bengazi F, Wennstrom JL, Lekholm U. Recession of the soft tissue margin at oral implants. A 2-year longitudinal prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996 Dec;7(4):303-10. [PubMed] [Crossref]
8. Cardaropoli G, Lekholm U, Wennstrom JL. Tissue alterations at implant-supported single-tooth replacements: a 1-year prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Apr;17(2):165-71. [PubMed] [Crossref]
9. Cooper L, Felton DA, Kugelberg CF, Ellner S, Chaffee N, Molina AL, et al. A multicenter 12-month evaluation of single-tooth implants restored 3 weeks after 1-stage surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001 Mar-Apr;16(2): 182-92. [PubMed]
10. Ekfeldt A, Eriksson A, Johansson LA. Periimplant mucosal level in patients treated with implant-supported fixed prostheses: a 1-year follow-up study. Int J Prosthodont 2003 Sep-Oct;16(5):529-32. [PubMed]
11. Grunder U. Stability of the mucosal topography around single-tooth implants and adjacent teeth: 1-year results. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000 Feb; 20(1): 11–17. [PubMed]
12. Oates TW, West J, Jones J, Kaiser D, Cochran DL. Long-term changes in soft tissue height on the facial surface of dental implants. Implant Dent 2002;11(3): 272-9. [PubMed] [Crossref]
13. Small PN, Tarnow DP. Gingival recession around implants: A 1-year longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000 Jul-Aug; 15(4):527–532. [PubMed]
14. Lambert J,Stumpel, Wadhwani, Chandur. Development and capture of soft tissue contours at time of implant placement. J of Prost Dent. 2017; 117( 6):709-713.
15. Brescovitt R, Thome G, Melo A, Silva R. Soft tissue behaviour around dental implants placed in fresh extraction sockets and immediately restored in aesthetic area: a preliminary short-term evaluation. Rev Odontol UNESP. 2017; 46(4):196-202.
16. Tarnow D, Elian N, Fletcher P, Froum S, Magner A, Cho SC, et al. Vertical distance from the crest of bone to the height of the interproximal papilla between adjacent implants. J Periodontol. 2003 Dec;74(12):1785–1788. [PubMed] [Crossref]
17. Tarnow DP, Eskow RN, Zamzok J. Aesthetics and implant dentistry. Periodontol 2000. 1996 Jun; 11:85-94. [PubMed] [Crossref]
18. Tarnow DP, Magner AW, Fletcher P. The effect of the distance from the contact point to the crest of bone on the presence or absence of the interproximal dental papilla. J Periodontol. 1992 Dec; 63(12):995- 996. [PubMed] [Crossref]
19. Azer S. S. A Simplified Technique for Creating a Customized GingivalEmergence Profile forImplant-Supported Crowns. J Prosthodont. 2010 Aug; 19(6): 497–501. [PubMed] [Crossref]
20. Steigmann M, Monje A, Chan H, Wang H. Emergence Profile Design Based on Implant Position in the Esthetic Zone. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent.2014 Jul-Aug;34(4):559–563. [PubMed] [Crossref]
21. Huan S. Oscar G. Arnold W. Ernesto L. Considerations of Implant Abutment and Crown Contour: Critical Contour and Subcritical Contour. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010 Aug;30(4):335-43. [PubMed]
22. Edward J, George JM, Prakash DG. Evaluation of peri-implant soft tissues and hard tissues in titanium implants in immediate and delayed cases: A comparative study. J Dent Implant. 2017; 7:3-10.
23. Monje A, Blasi G. Significance of keratinized mucosa/gingiva on peri-implant and adjacent periodontal conditions in erratic maintenance compliers. J Periodontol. 2019 May;90(5):445-453. [PubMed] [Crossref]
24. Furhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T, Haas R, Mailath G, Watzek G. Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Dec;16(6):639-44. [PubMed] [Crossref]
25. Park S., Da Silva JD, Weber HP, Ishikawa-Nagai S. Optical phenomenon of peri-implant soft tissue. Part I. Spectrophotometric assessment of natural tooth gingiva and peri-implant mucosa. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007Oct; 18(5):569-74. [PubMed] [Crossref]
26. Testori T, Bianchi F, Del Fabbro M, Capelli M, Zuffetti F, Berlucchi I, et al. Implant aesthetic score for evaluating the outcome: Immediate loading in the aesthetic zone. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2005 Mar;17(2):123-30. [PubMed]
27. Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Welander M, Lang NP, Lindhe J. Morphogenesis of the peri-implant mucosa: An experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Feb; 18(1):1–8. [PubMed] [Crossref]
28. Chiu Y., Lee S., Lin Y., Lai Y. Significance of the width of keratinized mucosa on peri-implant health. J Chin Med Assoc. 2015 Jul; 78(7):389-394. [PubMed] [Crossref]
29. Schrott AR, Jimenez M, Hwang JW, Fiorellini J, Weber HP. Five-year evaluation of the influence of keratinized mucosa on peri-implant soft-tissue health and stability around implants supporting full-arch mandibular fixed prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Oct;20(10):1170-7. [PubMed] [Crossref]
30. Buyukozdemir Askin S, Berker E, Akincibay H, Uysal S, Erman B, Tezcan I, et al. Necessity of keratinized tissues for dental implants: a clinical, immunological, and radiographic study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Feb;17(1):1-12. [PubMed] [Crossref]
31. Mericske-Stern R, Steinlin Schaffner T, Marti P, Geering AH. Peri-implant mucosal aspects of ITI implants supporting overdentures. A five-year longitudinal study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1994 Mar; 5(1):9-18. ( [PubMed] [Crossref]
32. Thoma DS, Muhlemann S, Jung RE . Critical soft-tissue dimensions with dental implants and treatment concepts. Periodontol 2000. 2014 Oct; 66(1):106-18. [PubMed] [Crossref]
33. van Eekeren P, van Elsas P, Tahmaseb A, Wismeijer D.The influence of initial mucosal thickness on crestal bone change in similar macrogeometrical implants: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Feb; 28(2):214-218. [PubMed] [Crossref]
34. Linkevicius T, Apse P, Grybauskas S, Puisys A. The influence of soft tissue thickness on crestal bone changes around implants: a 1-year prospective controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009Jul-Aug; 24(4):712-9. [PubMed]
35. The evaluation, assessment, and care of dental implants google on: all June 14, 2012By Lynn Mortilla, RDH, Advanced Concepts in the Evaluation, Assessment & Care of Dental Implants at the ADHA meeting in Phoenix on June 14, 2012.
36. Albrektsson T. Zarb G. Worthington P. Eriksson AR. The Long-Term Efficacy of Currently Used Dental Implants: A Review and Proposed Criteria of Success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986 Summer;1(1):11-25. [PubMed]
37. Belser U, Buser D, Higginbottom F. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding esthetics in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004; 19:73-74. [PubMed]
38. Belser U, Schmid B, Higginbottom F, Buser D. Outcome analysis of implant restorations located in the anterior maxilla: a review of the recent literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004; 19:30–42. [PubMed]
39. Jemt T. Regeneration of gingival papillae after single-implant treatment. Int J Periodont and Rest Dentistry. 1997 Aug;17(4):326-33. [PubMed]
40. Mazur Z, Korabek L, Mazur D. Peri-implant tissue score (PITS) as a measure of success, applied to 869 dental implants from a retrospective clinical study. Quintessence Int. 2018; 49(7):567-579. [PubMed] [Crossref]
41. Parpaiola A., Sbricoli L, Guazzo R, Bressan E, Lops D. Managing the Peri-implant Mucosa: A Clinically Reliable Method for Optimizing Soft Tissue Contours and Emergence Profile. J Esthet and Restor Dent. 2013 Oct; 25(5):317–323. [PubMed] [Crossref]
42. Stumpel LJ, Wadhwani C. A Customized Healing Abutment for Immediate and Delayed Implant Cases. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2017 Nov/Dec;38(10):672-678. [PubMed]
Received: 24 April 2019
Published online: 25 February 2020