 |
Publisher: Peytchinski Publishing Ltd.
ISSN: 1312-773X (Online)
Issue: 2020, vol. 26, issue2
Subject Area: Dental Medicine
-
DOI: 10.5272/jimab.2020262.3107
Published online: 30 April 2020
Original article
J of IMAB. 2020 Apr-Jun;26(2):3107-3113
INFLUENCE OF CROWN HEIGHT SPACE IN CASES OF DETACHMENT OF THE IMPLANT SUPPORTED FIXED PARTIAL DENTURES: RETROSPECTIVE CLINICAL STUDY
Dimitar Kirov1
, Biser Stoichkov2,
1) Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University, Sofia, Bulgaria.
2) Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University, Sofia, Bulgaria.
ABSTRACT:
Aim of the study: The purpose of the current study was to determine the influence of the crown height space on the loss of retention in different types of implant-supported Fixed Partial Dentures (FPD).
Material and Methods: 116 patients being partially edentulous regarding maxilla and mandibula have been followed retrospectively and restored by means of fixed prostheses on 261 implants. The study covered a five-year follow-up. The following indicators have been traced: implantation area, type of prosthetic restorations (single crowns, splinted crowns, bridge implant - implant, bridge implant - natural tooth), the height of restorative space and detachment of prosthetic restorations.
Results: The detachment of the prosthesis was found in 5.7% of all cases. This was most frequently seen in the mandibular molar area (73.33%) when single crown restorations were used. The incidence of loss of retention increased when the crown height space was less than 8.0 mm. The conducted tests showed that these indicators affect with statistical significance.
Conclusion: The results of the current study give us grounds for assuming that the reduced crown height space, the places of implantation and the type of restorations are important prerequisites for the occurrence of prosthetic restorations detachment.
Keywords: crown height space, detachment of FPD, dental implant complications, implant supported FPD,
- Download FULL TEXT /PDF 2236 KB/
Please cite this article as: Kirov D, Stoichkov B. Influence of crown height space in cases of detachment of the implant supported fixed partial dentures: Retrospective clinical study. J of IMAB. 2020 Apr-Jun;26(2):3107-3113. DOI: 10.5272/jimab.2020262.3107
Correspondence to: Dimitar Kirov, assistant Professor, DDS, PhD, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University; 1, St. Georgi Sofyiski Str., 1431 Sofia, Bulgaria; E-mail: dimiterkirov@gmail.com
REFERENCES:
1. Jain JK, SethuramanR, Chauhan S, Javiya P, Srivastava S, Patel R, et al. Retention failures in cement- and screw-retained fixed restorations on dental implants in partially edentulous arches: A systematic review with meta-analysis. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2018 Jul-Sep;18(3):201-211. [PubMed] [Crossref]
2. Millen C, Brägger U, Wittneben JG. Influence of prosthesis type and retention mechanism on complications with fixed implant-supported prostheses: a systematic review applying multivariate analyses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Jan-Feb;30(1):110-24. [PubMed] [Crossref]
3. Lemos CA, de Souza Batista VE, Almeida DA, Santiago Junior JF, Verri FR, Pellizzer EP. Evaluation of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-supported restorations for marginal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Apr;115(4):419-27. [PubMed] [Crossref]
4. Wittneben JG, Buser D, Salvi GE, Bürgin W, Hicklin S, Brägger U. Complication and failure rates with implant-supported fixed dental prostheses and single crowns: a 10-year retrospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Jun;16(3):356-64. [PubMed] [Crossref]
5. Ferreiroa A, Peñarrocha-Diago M, Pradíes G, Sola-Ruiz MF, Agustín-Panadero R. Cemented and screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth restorations in the molar mandibular region: A retrospective comparison study after an observation period of 1 to 4 years. J Clin Exp Dent. 2015 Feb 1;7(1):e89-94. [PubMed] [Crossref]
6. Mangano F, Macchi A, Caprioglio A, Sammons RL, Piattelli A, Mangano C. Survival and complication rates of fixed restorations supported by locking-taper implants: a prospective study with 1 to 10 years of follow-up. J Prosthodont. 2014 Aug;23(6):434-44. [PubMed] [Crossref]
7.Ülkü SZ, Acun Kaya F, Uysal E, Gulsun B. Clinical Evaluation of Complications in Implant-Supported Dentures: A 4-Year Retrospective Study. Med Sci Monit. 2017 Dec 27;23:6137-6143. [PubMed] [Crossref]
8.Wang JH, Judge R, Bailey D. A 5-Year Retrospective Assay of Implant Treatments and Complications in Private Practice: The Restorative Complications of Single and Short-Span Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses. Int J Prosthodont. 2016 Sep-Oct;29(5):435-44. [PubMed] [Crossref]
9. Misch CE. Dental Implant Prosthetics. 2nd ed. Maryland Heights, Mo: Mosby; 2015, p. 165-67. [Crossref]
10. Misch CE, Goodacre CJ, Finley JM, Misch CM, Marinbach M, Dabrowsky T, et al. Consensus conference panel report: crown-height space guidelines for implant dentistry-part 2. Implant Dent. 2006 Jun;15(2):113-21. [PubMed] [Crossref]
11. Bresciano M, Schierano G, Manzella C, Screti A, Bignardi C, Preti G. Retention of luting agents on implant abutments of different height and taper. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Oct;16(5):594-8. [PubMed] [Crossref]
12. Bernal G, Okamura M, Muñoz CA. The effeacts of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations. J Prosthodont. 2003 Jun;12(2):111-5. [PubMed] [Crossref]
13. Saber FS, Abolfazli N, Nuroloyuni S, Khodabakhsh S, Bahrami M, Nahidi R, et al. Effect of Abutment Height on Retention of Single Cement-retained, Wide- and Narrow-platform Implant-supported Restorations. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2012 Summer;6(3):98-102. [PubMed] [Crossref]
14.Clelland N, Chaudhry J, Rashid RG, McGlumphy E. Split-Mouth Comparison of Splinted and Nonsplinted Prostheses on Short Implants: 3-Year Results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Sep-Oct;31(5):1135-41. [PubMed] [Crossref]
15. Pellizzer EP, de Mello CC, Santiago Junior JF, de Souza Batista VE, de Faria Almeida DA, Verri FR. Analysis of the biomechanical behavior of short implants: The photo-elasticity method. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2015 Oct;55:187-92. [PubMed] [Crossref]
16. De Souza Batista VE, Verri FR, Lemos CAA, Cruz RS, Oliveira HFF, Gomes JML, et al. Should the restoration of adjacent implants be splinted or nonsplinted? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Jan;121(1):41-51. [PubMed] [Crossref]
17. Tsouknidas A, Giannopoulos D, Savvakis S, Michailidis N, Lympoudi E, Fytanidis D, et al. The Influence of Bone Quality on the Biomechanical Behavior of a Tooth-Implant Fixed Partial Denture: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Nov/Dec;31(6):e143-e154. [PubMed] [Crossref]
18. Mamalis A, Markopoulou K, Kaloumenos K, Analitis A. Splinting osseointegrated implants and natural teeth in partially edentulous patients: a systematic review of the literature. J Oral Implantol. 2012 Aug;38(4):424-34. [PubMed] [Crossref]
19. Hita-Carrillo C, Hernández-Aliaga M, Calvo-Guirado JL. Tooth-implant connection: a bibliographic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010 Mar 1;15(2):e387-94. [PubMed] [Crossref]
20. Michalakis KX, Calvani P, Hirayama H. Biomechanical considerations on tooth-implant supported fixed partial dentures. J Dent Biomech. 2012;3:1758736012462025. [PubMed] [Crossref]
21. Nematollahi F, Beyabanaki E, Alikhasi M. Cement Selection for Cement-Retained Implant-Supported Prostheses: A Literature Review. J Prosthodont. 2016 Oct;25(7):599-606. [PubMed] [Crossref]
22. Resnik R, Misch CE. Avoiding Complications in Oral Implantology. St. Louis(Missouri 63043 USA), Elsevier Inc., c. 2018, Chapter 3: Treatment Planning Complications; p. 67-68. [Crossref]
23. Cano-Batalla J, Soliva-Garriga J, Campillo-Funollet M, Munoz-Viveros CA, Giner-Tarrida L. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Jan-Feb; 27(1):36-41. [PubMed]
24. Al Hamad KQ, Al Rashdan BA, Abu-Sitta EH. The effects of height and surface roughness of abutments and the type of cement on bond strength of cement-retained implant restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Jun;22(6):638-44. [PubMed] [Crossref]
25. Abbo B, Razzoog ME, Vivas J, Sierraalta M. Resistance to Dislodgement of Zirconia Copings Cemented Onto Titanium Abutments of Different Heights. J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Jan;99(1):25-9. [PubMed] [Crossref]
26. Rödiger M, Rinke S, Ehret-Kleinau F, Pohlmeyer F, Lange K, Bürgers R, et al. Evaluation of removal forces of implant-supported zirconia copings depending on abutment geometry, luting agent and cleaning method during recementation. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014;6:233-40. [PubMed] [Crossref]
27. Safari S, Hosseini Ghavam F, Amini P, Yaghmaei K. Effects of abutment diameter, luting agent type, and recementation on the retention of implant-supported CAD/CAM metal copings over short abutments. J Adv Prosthodont. 2018 Feb;10(1):1-7. [PubMed] [Crossref]
28. Nissan J, Gross O, Ghelfan O, Priel I, Gross M, Chaushu G. The effect of splinting implant-supported restorations on stress distribution of different crown-implant ratios and crown height spaces. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Dec;69(12):2990-4. [PubMed] [Crossref]
29. Lemos CAA, Verri FR, Santiago JF Júnior, Almeida DAF, Batista VES, Noritomi PY, et al. Retention System and Splinting on Morse Taper Implants in the Posterior Maxilla by 3D Finite Element Analysis. Braz Dent J. 2018 Jan-Feb;29(1):30-35. [PubMed] [Crossref]
30. Shrivastav M. Effect of surface treatments on the retention of implant-supported cement-retained bridge with short abutments: An in vitro comparative evaluation. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2018 Apr-Jun;18(2):154-60. [PubMed] [Crossref]
31. Rues S, Fugina M, Rammelsberg P, Kappel S. Cemented Single Crown Retention on Dental Implants: An In Vitro Study. Int J Prosthodont. 2017 Mar-Apr;30(2):133-135. [PubMed] [Crossref].
Received: 25 June 2019
Published online: 30 April 2020