 |
Publisher: Peytchinski Publishing Ltd.
ISSN: 1312-773X (Online)
Issue: 2021, vol. 27, issue3
Subject Area: Dental Medicine
-
DOI: 10.5272/jimab.2021273.3881
Published online: 17 August 2021
Original article
J of IMAB. 2021 Jul-Sep;27(3):3881-3884
EXPERIMENTAL SETTING FOR TESTING THE BOND STRENGTH BETWEEN METAL ALLOY AND PEEK
Zhivko Georgiev
, Svetlin Alexandrov, Zlatina Tomova,
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
ABSTRACT:
Purpose: The aim of the article is to present an experimental setting for bending strength testing of metal specimens covered with PEEK.
Materials and methods: Three groups of metal specimens made of cobalt chromium alloy are produced using the lost wax technique: group 1 – specimens with a smooth metal surface; group 2 – sand blasted metal surface; group 3 - sand blasted metal surface with retention crystals. The shape and size of the specimens are designed to correspond to the retentive elements of the apparatus for micro tension and micro pressure LMT 100. PEEK is pressed over the specimens, and after thermal cycling, the bond between metal alloy and PEEK is studied using bending strength three-point micro testing.
Results and discussion: The experimental setting is focused on the type of specific contact surface between the two materials. The design corresponds to the requirements of apparatus LMT 100 and allows the production of a big number of specimens. Because of the thermal regime of BioHPP pressing, it is impossible to add groups of specimens using contemporary adhesives on the metal surface.
Conclusion: Created specimens allow strength investigation by three-point bending micro testing. The experimental setting provides the production of a big number of specimens with the same shape and size.
Keywords: specimens, PEEK, experimental setting,
- Download FULL TEXT /PDF 2313 KB/
Please cite this article as: Georgiev Z, Alexandrov S, Tomova Z. Experimental setting for testing the bond strength between metal alloy and PEEK. J of IMAB. 2021 Jul-Sep;27(3):3881-3884. DOI: 10.5272/jimab.2021273.3881
Correspondence to: Zhivko Georgiev, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University Plovdiv; 15 A, Vasil Aprilov blv., 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria; E-mail: Jivko_169@abv.bg
REFERENCES:
1. Abu Bakar MS, Cheng MH, Tang SM, Yu SC, Liao K, Tan CT, et al. Tensile properties, tension-tension fatigue and biological response of polyetheretherketone-hydroxyapatite composites for load-bearing orthopedic implants. Biomaterials. 2003 Jun;24(13):2245-50. [PubMed]
2. Georgiev J, Vlahova A, Kissov H, Aleksandrov S, Kazakova R. Possible application of BioHPP in prosthetic dentistry: a literature review. J of IMAB. 2018 Jan-Mar;24(1):1896-1898. [Crossref]
3. Georgiev Zh. [Combined Prosthetic restorations made of PEEK and metal alloys]. [Dissertation] Medical University Plovdiv 2018 [in Bulgarian]; 47-79.
4. Bechir ES, Bechir A, Giora C, Manu R, Burcea A, Dascalu IT. The Advantages of BioHPP Polymer as Superstructure Material in Oral Implantology. Mater Plast. 2016 Sep;53(3):394-398. [Internet]
5. Schwitalla AD, Spintig T, Kallage I, Müller WD. Pressure behavior of different PEEK materials for dental implants. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016 Feb;54:295-304. [PubMed]
6. Schwitalla AD, Spintig T, Kallage I, Müller WD. Flexural behavior of PEEK materials for dental application. Dent Mater. 2015 Nov;31(11):1377-84. [PubMed]
7. Fuhrmann G, Steiner M, Freitag-Wolf S, Kern M. Resin bonding to three types of polyaryletherketones (PAEKs)-durability and influence of surface conditioning. Dent Mater. 2014 Mar;30(3):357-63. [PubMed]
8. Hallmann L, Mehl A, Sereno N, Hämmerle CHF. The improvement of adhesive properties of PEEK through different pre-treatments. Applied Surface Science. 2012 Jul 1;258(18):7213-18. [Crossref]
9. Kern M, Lehmann F. Influence of surface conditioning on bonding to polyetheretherketon (PEEK). Dental Mater. 2012 Dec;28(12):1280-3. [PubMed ]
10. Boinard E, Pethrick R, MacFarlane C. The influence of thermal history on the dynamic mechanical and dielectric studies of polyetheretherketone exposed to water and brine. Polymer. 2000 Feb;41(3):1063–76. [Crossref ]
11. Sarot JR, Contar CM, Cruz AC, de Souza Magini R. Evaluation of the stress distribution in CFR-PEEK dental implants by the three-dimensional finite element method. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010 Jul;21(7):2079-85. [PubMed ]
12. Sproesser O, Schmidlin PR, Uhrenbacher J, Roos M, Gernet W, Stawarczyk B. Effect of sulfuric acid etching of polyetheretherketone on the shear bond strength to resin cements. J Adhes Dent. 2014 Oct;16(5):465-72. [PubMed]
13. Wimmer T, Huffmann AM, Eichberger M, Schmidlin PR, Stawarczyk B. Two-body wear rate of PEEK, CAD/CAM resin composite and PMMA: Effect of specimen geometries, antagonist materials and test set-up configuration. Dent Mater. 2016 Jun;32(6): e127-36. [PubMed]
.
Received: 12 January 2021
Published online: 17 August 2021