head JofIMAB
Journal of IMAB - Annual Proceeding (Scientific Papers)
Publisher: Peytchinski Publishing Ltd.
ISSN: 1312-773X (Online)
Issue: 2022, vol. 28, issue4
Subject Area: Medicine
-
DOI: 10.5272/jimab.2022284.4683
Published online: 15 November 2022

Original article
J of IMAB. 2022 Oct-Dec;28(4):4683-4687
COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF THE GLENOID COMPONENT IN REVERSE SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY
Svetoslav DobrilovORCID logo Corresponding Autoremail,
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Hospital "St. Marina", Medical University - Varna, Bulgaria.

ABSTRACT:
The positioning of the glTenoid component in RSA ( Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty) is one of the factors determining implant survival and postoperative outcomes. Therefore, accurate determination of the glenoid version and inclination in RSA is essential for the surgeon - preoperatively to plan his work and postoperatively - to assess the outcome. Excessive retroversion and superior inclination are prerequisites for unsatisfactory results and are associated with a high frequency of revisions.
The glenoid inclination is often described as the angle between the glenoid fossa line and the suprascapular reference line. The study included a 2-year follow-up of patients with reverse shoulder arthroplasty in the Department of Orthopedics. The analysis is based on pre / postoperative CT and three-dimensional reconstruction using Medi Cad software. A comparative analysis was made with the results obtained by X-ray examination.
The results showed a high incidence of superior inclination of native glenoid fossae. The obtained ß-inclination angle averaged 13.8 °, and the difference in this radiographically measured parameter was 7.3 °. CT analysis preoperatively significantly improves the position of the glenoid component and avoids the superior inclination of the baseplate of the prosthesis.

Keywords: RSA, ß-angle, CT, glenoid inclination,

pdf - Download FULL TEXT /PDF 1999 KB/
Please cite this article as: Dobrilov S. Computer tomographic analysis of the glenoid component in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J of IMAB. 2022 Oct-Dec;28(4):4683-4687. DOI: 10.5272/jimab.2022284.4683

Corresponding AutorCorrespondence to: Dr Svetoslav Dobrilov MD, PhD, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology; 1, Hristo Smirnenski Blvd., Varna 9010, Bulgaria; E-mail: svetlyo_d@yahoo.com

REFERENCES:
1. Hughes RE, Bryant CR, Hall JM, Wening J, Huston LJ, Kuhn JE, et al. Glenoid inclination is associated with full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Feb;407:86-91. [Crossref]
2. Moor BK, Wieser K, Slankamenac K, Gerber C, Bouaicha S. Relationship of individual scapular anatomy and degenerative rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Apr;23(4):536-41. [Crossref]
3. Bonnevialle N, Geais L, Müller JH; Shoulder Friends Institute, Berhouet J. Effect of RSA glenoid baseplate central fixation on micromotion and bone stress. JSES Int. 2020 Aug 1;4(4):979-986. [PubMed]
4. Iannotti JP, Ricchetti ET, Rodriguez EJ, Bryan JA. Development and validation of a new method of 3-dimensional assessment of glenoid and humeral component position after total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Oct;22(10):1413-22.
5. Maurer A, Fucentese SF, Pfirrmann CW, Wirth SH, Djahangiri A, Jost B, et al. assessment of glenoid inclination on routine clinical radiographs and computed tomography examinations of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Aug;21(8):1096-103. [Crossref]
6. Walch G, Vezeridis PS, Boileau P, Deransart P, Chaoui J. Threedimensional planning and use of patient-specific guides improve glenoid component position: an in vitro study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Feb;24(2):302-9. [Crossref]
7. Zumstein M, Pinedo M, Old J, Boileau P. Problems, complications, reoperations, and revisions in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Jan;20(1):146-157. [Crossref]
8. Zhang M, Junaid S, Gregory T, Hansen U, Cheng CK. Effect of baseplate positioning on fixation of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2019 Feb;62:15-22. [PubMed]
9. Lädermann A, Denard PJ, Boileau P, Farron A, Deransart P, Walch G. What is the best glenoid configuration in onlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty? Int Orthop. 2018 Jun;42(6):1339-1346. [PubMed]
10. Lädermann A, Gueorguiev B, Charbonnier C, Stimec BV, Fasel JHD, Zderic I, et al. Scapular notching on kinematic simulated range of motion after reverse shoulder arthroplasty is not the result of impingement in adduction. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Sep;94(38):e1615. [PubMed]
11. Boileau P, Morin-Salvo N, Gauci MO, Seeto BL, Chalmers PN, Holzer N, et al. Angled BIO-RSA (bony-increased offset-reverse shoulder arthroplasty): a solution for the management of glenoid bone loss and erosion. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Dec;26(12):2133-42. [Crossref]
12. Boileau P, O'Shea K, Moineau G, Roussane Y. Bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty (BIO-RSA) for cuff tear arthropathy. Oper Tech Orthop. 2011 Mar;21(1):69-78. [Crossref
13. Schoch BS, Haupt E, Leonor T, Farmer KW, Wright TW, King JJ. Computer navigation leads to more accurate glenoid targeting during total shoulder arthroplasty compared with 3-dimensional preoperative planning alone. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Nov;29(11):2257-2263. [PubMed]
14. Hopkins AR, Hansen UN, Amis AA, Emery R. The effects of glenoid component alignment variations on cement mantle stresses in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004 Nov;13(6):668-75. [Crossref]
15. Neyton L, Boileau P, Nove-Josserand L, Edwards TB, Walch G. Glenoid bone grafting with a reverse design prosthesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007 May;16(3 Suppl):S71-8. [Crossref]
16. Duethman NC, Aibinder WR, Nguyen NTV, Sanchez-Sotelo J. The influence of glenoid component position on scapular notching: a detailed radiographic analysis at midterm follow-up. JSES Int. 2020 Jan 14;4(1):144-150. [PubMed]
17. Valenti P, Sauzières P, Katz D, Kalouche I, Kilinc AS. Do less medialized reverse shoulder prostheses increase motion and reduce notching? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Sep;469(9):2550-7. [PubMed]
18. Matsumura N, Oki S, Suzuki T, Iwamoto T, Sato K, Nakamura M, et al. A computed tomography analysis of three-dimensional glenoid orientation modified by glenoid torsion. JSES Open Access. 2018 Sep 21;2(4):194-199. [PubMed]
19. Denard PJ, Provencher MT, Lädermann A, Romeo AA, Parsons BO, Dines JS. Version and inclination obtained with 3-dimensional planning in total shoulder arthroplasty: do different programs produce the same results? JSES Open Access. 2018 Sep 21;2(4):200-204. [PubMed]

Received: 17 May 2022
Published online: 15 November 2022

back to Online Journal