 |
Publisher: Peytchinski Publishing Ltd.
ISSN: 1312-773X (Online)
Issue: 2023, vol. 29, issue2
Subject Area: Dental Medicine
-
DOI: 10.5272/jimab.2023292.4904
Published online: 05 May 2023
Original article
J of IMAB. 2023 Apr-Jun;29(2):4904-4910
COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF FLUORIDE RELEASE FROM A COMPOMER, A GIOMER AND A CONVENTIONAL GIC
Viktoriya Gateva1
, Natalia Gateva-Grancharova1, Tanya Yordanova2,
1) Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University – Sofia, Bulgaria.
2) Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry and Pharmacy, Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski", Bulgaria.
ABSTRACT:
Purpose: The aim of the study was to measure and compare the release of fluoride ions from three bioactive restorative materials used for restorations in primary dentition - conventional GIC Fuji IX GP Extra, compomer Dyract and giomer Beautifil II.
Materials and methods: 20 samples with a diameter of 6 mm and a thickness of 2 mm were made from the tested materials. At the beginning of the test, all samples were immersed in 5 ml of deionized water and placed in an incubator for 24 hours at 37°C ± 0.5°C. After 24 hours, the concentration of fluoride ions in the medium was measured with an ion-selective electrode for fluorides connected to an ion meter. During this time, the removed cylindrical samples were washed with fresh deionized water, dried, and transferred to new vials with 5 ml of fresh deionized water. The described procedure was repeated every day for a week and then on the 14th, 21st and 28th days.
Results: GIC outperformed compomer and giomer in terms of fluoride ions release for all time intervals with a statistically significant difference. The difference between compomer and giomer was not reliable, but compomer demonstrated higher values for all time intervals.
Conclusion: All studied materials released fluoride ions during the entire experimental period, with the highest concentrations being recorded on the first day of the study. GIC outperformed compomer and giomer many times in terms of fluoride release for all time intervals.
Keywords: compomer, giomer, conventional GIC, fluoride release, primary dentition,
- Download FULL TEXT /PDF 1045 KB/
Please cite this article as: Gateva V, Gateva-Grancharova N, Yordanova T. Comparative evaluation of fluoride release from a compomer, a giomer and a conventional GIC. J of IMAB. 2023 Apr-Jun;29(2):4904-4910. DOI: 10.5272/jimab.2023292.4904
Correspondence to: Viktoriya Velizarova Gateva, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University – Sofia; 1, GeorgiSofiyski str., Sofia, Bulgaria; E-mail: viktoriya1gateva@abv.bg
REFERENCES:
1. Jingarwar MM, Pathak A, Bajwa NK, Sidhu HS. Quantitative assessment of fluoride release and rechargeability of different restorative materials indifferent media: an in vitro study. J ClinDiagnRes. 2014 Dec;8(12):ZC31-4. [PubMed]
2. Hetrodt F, Lausch J, Meyer-Lueckel H, Apel C, Conrads G. Evaluation of Restorative Materials Containing Preventive Additivesin a Secondary Caries Modelinvitro. Caries Res. 2019;53(4):447-456. [PubMed]
3. Kumari PD, Khijmatgar S, Chowdhury A, Lynch E, Chowdhury CR. Factors influencing fluoride release in atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) materials: A review. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2019 Oct-Dec;9(4):315-320. [PubMed]
4. Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Lassila L. Characterization of fluoride releasing restorative dental materials. DentMater J. 2018 Mar 30;37(2):293-300. [PubMed]
5. Dionysopoulos D. The effect of fluoride-releasing restorative materials on inhibition of secondary caries formation. Research review Fluoride. 2014 Jul-Sep;47(3)258-265. [Internet]
6. G Nigam A, Jaiswal J, Murthy R, Pandey R. Estimation of fluoride release from various dental materials in different media-an invitro study. Int J ClinPediatr Dent. 2009 Jan;2(1):1-8. [PubMed]
7. Nicholson JW, Czarnecka B. Conventional glass-ionomer cements. In: Materials for the direct restoration of teeth. 1st edition. Woodhead Publishing. May 10, 2016. p.107-36. [Internet]
8. Babar MG, Lin SL. Cariostatic effect of fluoride-containing restorative materials: a review. Malays Dent J. 2009 Jan;30(2):130-36.
9. Attar N, Onen A. Fluoride release and uptake characteristics of aesthetic restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil. 2002 Aug;29(8):791-8. [PubMed]
10. Saku S, Kotake H, Scougall-Vilchis RJ, Ohashi S, Hotta M, Horiuchi S, et al. Antibacterial activity of composite resin with glass-ionomer filler particles. Dent< Mater J. 2010 Mar;29(2):193-8. [PubMed]
11. Vaidyanathan TK, Vaidyanathan J. Recent advances in the theory and mechanism of adhesive resin bonding to dentin: a critical review. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009 Feb;88(2):558-78. [PubMed]
12. Raggio DP, Tedesco TK, Calvo AF, Braga MM. Doglassionomer cements prevent caries lesions in margins of restorations in primary teeth?: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Dent Assoc. 2016 Mar;147(3):177-85. [PubMed]
13. Pollick H. The Role of Fluoride in the Prevention of Tooth Decay. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2018 Oct;65(5):923-940. [PubMed]
14. Wasiluk A. Fluoride compounds in dental caries prophylaxis in children and adolescents – review of polish literature. Przeglepidemiol. 2017;71(4):603-611. [PubMed]
15. Mousavinasab SM, Meyers I. Fluoridereleasebyglassionomercements, compomerandgiomer. DentRes J (Isfahan). 2009 Fall;6(2):75-81. [PubMed]
16. Nicholson JW. Fluoride-releasing dental restorative materials: An update. Balkan J Dent Med. 2014;18(2):60-69. [Crossref]
17. Bansal R, Bansal T. A Comparative Evaluation of the Amount of Fluoride Release and Re-Release after Recharging from Aesthetic Restorative Materials: AninvitroStudy. J ClinDiagnRes. 2015 Aug;9(8):ZC11-4. [PubMed]
18. Neelakantan P, John S, Anand S, Sureshbabu N, Subbarao C. Fluoride release from a newglass-ionomer cement. OperDent. 2011 Jan-Feb;36(1):80-5. [PubMed]
19. Dasgupta S, Saraswathi MV, Somayaji K, Pentapati KC, Shetty P. Comparative evaluation of fluoride release and recharge potential of novel and traditional fluoride-releasing restorative materials: Aninvitrostudy. J Conserv Dent. 2018 Nov-Dec;21(6):622-626. [PubMed]
20. Gordan VV, Blaser PK, Watson RE, Mjör IA, McEdward DL, Sensi LG, et al. A clinical evaluation of a giomer restorative system containing surface pre-reacted glass ionomer filler: results from a 13-year recall examination. J Am Dent Assoc. 2014 Oct;145(10):1036-43. [PubMed]
Received: 24 October 2022
Published online: 05 May 2023