 |
Publisher: Peytchinski Publishing Ltd.
ISSN: 1312-773X (Online)
Issue: 2024, vol. 30, issue2
Subject Area: Public Health
-
DOI: 10.5272/jimab.2024302.5587
Published online: 26 June 2024
Review article
J of IMAB. 2024 Apr-Jun;30(2):5587-5592
RAPID METHODS FOR DETECTION OF FOODBORNE PATHOGENS AND THEIR TOXINS - A REVIEW OF CURRENT TRENDS AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES
Rozalina Yordanova1
, Albena Andonova2
,
1) Medical College, Trakia University, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria.
2) Department of Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Trakia University, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria.
ABSTRACT:
Background: Food safety is of utmost importance to sustaining life and promoting good health and is a main problem in any country, regardless of economic and social development. Unsafe food containing harmful pathogens and their toxins cause hundreds of diseases, particularly affecting infants, young children, the elderly and sick people. Therefore, the rapid detection of foodborne pathogens is of great significance for public health. The aim of this review was to provide comprehensive information regarding methods for the detection of foodborne pathogens as well as genus Fusarium and their toxins, from fundamental to state-of-the-art, presenting their advantages and limitations in order to update current knowledge.
Review Results: The traditional culture-based methods for the detection of pathogens in food are usually laborious, limited by complex sample preparation procedures, time-consuming, slow to provide results, and require well-trained professional staff. However, compared to these methods, the new ones - immunological methods, nucleic acid-based assays and biosensor-based methods are rapid, accurate, highly sensitive and specific, and easy to use. Precisely providing accurate real-time results would help limit foodborne disease outbreaks, ensure compliance with legislation setting maximum levels of pathogens in certain food categories, detect and improve the import of food contaminated with dangerous levels of pathogenic microorganisms, and ensure public health safety.
Conclusion: The development of rapid and automated methods that detect real-time, small numbers of viable microbial cells within a given volume of food is vital in the prevention, transmission and treatment of foodborne diseases. Such methods would also offer a great commercial advantage in the food industry and related fields
Keywords: foodborne pathogens, Genus Fusarium, bacterial toxins, mycotoxins, rapid methods,
- Download FULL TEXT /PDF 506 KB/
Please cite this article as: Yordanova R, Andonova A. Rapid methods for detection of foodborne pathogens and their toxins - a review of current trends and future perspectives. J of IMAB. 2024 Apr-Jun;30(2):5587-5592. [Crossref - 10.5272/jimab.2024302.5587]
Correspondence to: Prof. Albena Andonova, Department of Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Trakia University, Stara Zagora; 11, Armeiska Str., 6000 Stara Zagora, Bulgaria; E-mail: albena.andonova@trakia-uni.bg
REFERENCES:
1. Food safety. WHO. 19 May 2022. [Internet]
2. Fusco V, Quero GM, Morea M, Blaiotta G, Visconti A. Rapid and reliable identification of Staphylococcus aureus harbouring the enterotoxin gene cluster (egc) and quantitative detection in raw milk by real time PCR. Int J Food Microbiol. 2011 Jan 5;144(3):528-537. [PubMed]
3. Marroquín-Cardona AG, Johnson NM, Phillips TD, Hayes AW. Mycotoxins in a changing global environment- a review. Food Chem Toxicol. 2014 Jul;69:220-230. [PubMed]
4. de Oliveira DN, Ferreira MS, Catharino RR. Rapid and simultaneous in situ assessment of aflatoxins and stilbenes using silica plate imprinting mass spectrometry imaging. PLoS One. 2014 Mar 4;9(3):e90901. [PubMed]
5. Hleba L, Císarová M, Shariati MA, Tančinová D. Detection of mycotoxins using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. J Microbiol Biotechnol Food Sci. 2017 Oct-Nov;7(2):181-185. [Crossref]
6. Kolesarova A, Capcarova M, Maruniakova N, Lukac N, Ciereszko RE, Sirotkin AV. Resveratrol inhibits reproductive toxicity induced by deoxynivalenol. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2012; 47(9):1329-34. [PubMed]
7. Mandal PK, Biswas AK, Choi K, Pal UK. Methods for rapid detection of foodborne pathogens: an overview. Am J Food Technol.2011; 6(2):87-102. [Crossref]
8. Zhao X, Lin CW, Wang J, Oh DH. Advances in rapid detection methods for foodborne pathogens. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014 Mar 28;24(3):297-312. [PubMed]
9. Li L, Mendis N, Trigui H, Oliver JD, Faucher SP. The importance of the viable but non-culturable state in human bacterial pathogens. Front Microbiol. 2014 Jun 2;5:258. [PubMed]
10. Jasson V, Jacxsens L, Luning P, Rajkovic A, Uyttendaele M. Alternative microbial methods: An overview and selection criteria. Food Microbiol. 2010 Sep;27(6):710-730. [PubMed]
11. Chowdary Akkina R, Payala V, Sushma Maganti S. Tools for Rapid Detection and Control of Foodborne Microbial Pathogens. In: Foodborne Pathogenes – Recent Advances in Control and Detection. Editors: Lamas A, Franco C, Ragal P. IntechOpen. 2023. Chapter 4. [Crossref]
12. Blodgett R. BAM Appendix 2 Most Probable Number from Serial Dilutions. FDA. 09/14/2023. [Internet]
13. Zheng MZ, Richard JL, Binder J. A review of rapid methods for the analysis of mycotoxins. Mycopathologia. 2006 May;161(5):261-273. [PubMed]
14. Janik E, Niemcewicz M, Podogrocki M, Ceremuga M, Gorniak L, Stela M, et al. The Existing Methods and Novel Approaches in Mycotoxins' Detection. Molecules. 2021 Jun 29;26(13):3981. [PubMed]
15. Nolan P, Auer S, Spehar A, Elliott CT, Campbell K. Current trends in rapid tests for mycotoxins. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2019 May;36(5):800-814. [PubMed]
16. Singh J, Mehta A. Rapid and sensitive detection of mycotoxins by advanced and emerging analytical methods: A review. Food Sci Nutr. 2020 Mar 25;8(5):2183-2204. [PubMed]
17. Leonard P, Hearty S, Brennan J, Dunne L, Quinn J, Chakraborty T, et al. Advances in biosensors for detection of pathogens in food and water. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 2003 Jan 2;32(1):3-13. [Crossref]
18. Vernozy-Rozand C, Mazuy-Cruchaudet C, Bavai C, Richard Y. Comparison of three immunological methods for detecting staphylococcal enterotoxins from food. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2004;39(6):490-4. [PubMed]
19. Glynn B, Lahiff S, Wernecke M, Barry T, Smith TJ, Maher M. Current and emerging molecular diagnostic technologies applicable to bacterial food safety. Int J Dairy Technol. 2006 May;59(2):126-139. [Crossref]
20. Al-Jaal B, Salama S, Al-Qasmi N, Jaganjac M. Mycotoxin contamination of food and feed in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries and its detection. Toxicon. 2019 Dec 5;171:43-50. [PubMed]
21. Oplatowska-Stachowiak M, Reiring C, Sajic N, Haasnoot W, Brabet C, Campbell K, et al. Development and in-house validation of a rapid and simple to use ELISA for the detection and measurement of the mycotoxin sterigmatocystin. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018 May;410(12):3017-3023. [PubMed]
22. Muldoon MT, Teaney G, Li J, Onisk DV, Stave JW. Bacteriophage-based enrichment coupled to immunochromatographic strip-based detection for the determination of Salmonella in meat and poultry. J Food Prot. 2007 Oct;70(10):2235-2242. [PubMed]
23. Liu Z, Hua Q, Wang J, Liang Z, Li J, Wu J, et al. A smartphone-based dual detection mode device integrated with two lateral flow immunoassays for multiplex mycotoxins in cereals. Biosens Bioelectron. 2020 Jun 15;158:112178. [PubMed]
24. Cook N. The use of NASBA for the detection of microbial pathogens in food and environmental samples. J Microbiol Methods. 2003 May;53(2):165-174. [PubMed]
25. Priyanka B, Patil RK, Dwarakanath S. A review on detection methods used for foodborne pathogens. Indian J Med Res. 2016 Sep;144(3):327-338. [PubMed]
26. Biswas AK, Kondaiah N, Bheilegaonkar KN, Anjaneyulu AS, Mendiratta SK, Jana C. et al. Microbial profiles of frozen trimmings and silver sides prepared at Indian buffalo meat packing plants. Meat Sci. 2008 Oct;80(2):418-422. [PubMed]
27. Min J, Baeumner AJ. Highly sensitive and specific detection of viable Escherichia coli in drinking water. Anal Biochem. 2002 Apr 15;303(2):186-193. [PubMed]
28. Kawasaki S, Horikoshi N, Okada Y, Takeshita K, Sameshima T, Kawamoto S. Multiplex PCR for simultaneous detection of Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes, and Escherichia coli O157:H7 in meat samples. J Food Prot. 2005 Mar;68(3):551-556. [PubMed]
29. Abravaya K, Huff J, Marshall R, Merchant B, Mullen C, Schneider G, et al. Molecular beacons as diagnostic tools: technology and applications. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2003 Apr;41(4):468-474. [PubMed]
30. Alvarenga JS, Ligeiro CM, Gontijo CM, Cortes S, Campino L, Vago AR, et al. KDNA genetic signatures obtained by LSSP-PCR analysis of Leishmania (Leishmania) infantum isolated from the new and the old world. PLoS One. 2012 Aug 17;7(8):e43363. [PubMed]
31. Notomi T, Okayama H, Masubuchi H, Yonekawa T, Watanabe K, Amino N, et al. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Jun 15;28(12):E63. [PubMed]
32. Yang H, Ma XY, Zhang XZ, Wang Y, Zhang W. Development and evaluation of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for the rapid detection of Staphylococcus aureus in food. Eur Food Res Technol. 2011 May;232:769-776. [Crossref]
33. Nadugala LMNS, Rakshit SK. DNase treated DNA multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay for rapid detection of viable food borne pathogen. J N Sci Foundation Sri Lanka. 2007 Dec 28;35(4), 225-233. [Crossref]
34. Singh A, Poshtiban S, Evoy S. Recent advances in bacteriophage based biosensors for foodborne pathogen detection. Sensors (Basel). 2013 Jan 30;13(2):1763-1786. [PubMed]
35. Rasooly A, Herold KE. Biosensors for the analysis of food- and waterborne pathogens and their toxins. J AOAC Int. 2006 May-Jun;89(3):873-883. [PubMed]
36. Asiello PJ, Baeumner AJ. Miniaturized isothermal nucleic acid amplification, a review. Lab Chip. 2011 April 21;11(8):1420-1430. [PubMed]
37. Pedrero M, Campuzano S, Pingarrón JM. Electroanalytical sensors and devices for multiplexed detection of foodborne pathogen microorganisms. Sensors (Basel). 2009;9(7):5503-5520. [PubMed]
38. Yue H, Zhou Y, Wang P, Wang X, Wang Z, Wang L, et al. A facile label-free electrochemiluminescent biosensor for specific detection of Staphylococcus aureus utilizing the binding between immunoglobulin G and protein A. Talanta. 2016 Jun 1;153:401-406. [PubMed]
39. Elosta S, Gajdošová D, Hégrová B, Havel J. MALDI TOF mass spectrometry of selected mycotoxins in barley. J Appl Biomed. 2007 Mar 31;5:39-47. [Crossref]
40. Singhal N, Kumar M, Kanaujia PK, Virdi JS. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry: an emerging technology for microbial identification and diagnosis. Front Microbiol. 2015 Aug 5;6:791. [PubMed]
41. Cherkaoui A, Hibbs J, Emonet S, Tangomo M, Girard M, Francois P, et al. Comparison of two matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry methods with conventional phenotypic identification for routine identification of bacteria to the species level. J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Apr;48(4):1169-1175. [PubMed]
42. Böhme K, Fernández-No IC, Barros-Velázquez J, Gallardo JM, Cañas B, Calo-Mata P. Rapid species identification of seafood spoilage and pathogenic Gram-positive bacteria by MALDI-TOF mass fingerprinting. Electrophoresis. 2011 Nov;32(21):2951-2965. [PubMed]
43. Gangadasu BR, Nagarjuna Reddy G, Dhanalakshmi K. Comparison of UPLC with UFLC: Liquid Chromatography. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2015 Mar-Apr;31(1):97-101. [Internet]
Received: 29 January 2024
Published online: 26 June 2024