head JofIMAB
Journal of IMAB - Annual Proceeding (Scientific Papers)
Publisher: Peytchinski Publishing Ltd.
ISSN: 1312-773X (Online)
Issue: 2025, vol. 31, issue3
Subject Area: Dental Medicine
-
DOI: 10.5272/jimab.2025313.6313
Published online: 08 July 2025

Original article
J of IMAB. 2025 Jul-Sep;31(3):6313-6321
SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF LITHIUM DISILICATE AND HYBRID CERAMIC WITH THREE TYPES OF LUTING CEMENT (A PILOT STUDY)
Mariana Yankova1ORCID logo, Rumen Radev1ORCID logo, Todor Uzunov1ORCID logo, Nikolay Apostolov1ORCID logo, Elka Radeva2ORCID logoCorresponding Autoremail,
1) Department of Prosthetic Dental Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University – Sofia, Bulgaria.
2) Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University – Sofia, Bulgaria.

ABSTRACT:
The present pilot study aimed to determine the bond strength between dentin and two types of ceramics cemented using three types of luting agents.
The purpose of this pilot study was to determine the bond strength between dentin and two types of ceramics cemented using three types of luting agents.
Materials and Methods: Seventy-two dentin discs were prepared from extracted teeth with intact dental crowns. Ceramic cylinders of two types, lithium disilicate (IPS emax CAD) and hybrid Ceramic (Vita Enamic), were cut and sintered to dimensions of 6/6 mm. Test specimens (dentin – cement – ceramic) were distributed into six groups (n = 12), depending on the ceramic material used and the cement used for adhesive fixation (eCEMENT, Variolink Esthetic DC, Panavia V5). They were subjected to shear bond strength testing. The results were statistically analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 26 with a significance level of 0.05.
Results: In Vita Enamic, the highest shear bond strength was observed with Panavia V5 cement (18.87±0.89 MPa), followed by Variolink Esthetic DC (14.03±4.45 MPa) and e-CEMENT (11.40±5.19 MPa) (p < 0.05). In IPS emax CAD, the best bond was again with Panavia V5 cement (17.53±3.39 MPa), followed by Variolink Esthetic DC (17.30±4.49 MPa) and eCEMENT (14.33±5.27 MPa), however without statistical significance (p > 0.05).
Conclusions: Within the limitation of the presented study, the composite cement Panavia V5 demonstrates better adhesive properties than the other two types of cement.

Keywords: hybrid ceramic, lithium disilicate ceramic, luting cements, shear bond strength,

pdf - Download FULL TEXT /PDF 997 KB/
Please cite this article as: Yankova M, Radev R, Uzunov T, Apostolov N, Radeva E. Shear Bond Strength of Lithium Disilicate and Hybrid Ceramic with Three Types of Luting Cement (a pilot study). J of IMAB. 2025 Jul-Sep;31(3):6313-6321. [Crossref - 10.5272/jimab.2025313.6313]

Corresponding AutorCorrespondence to: Assoc. Prof. Elka Radeva, DMD, PhD, Department of Conservative Dentistry Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University – Sofia; 1, Georgi Sofijski Blvd., Sofia 1431, Bulgaria; E-mail: eliradeva@abv.bg

REFERENCES:
1. Calheiros-Lobo MJ, Vieira T, Carbas R, da Silva LFM, Pinho T. Effectiveness of Self-Adhesive Resin Luting Cement in CAD-CAM Blocks-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Materials (Basel). 2023 Apr 10;16(8):2996. [PubMed]
2. Alsaeed AY. Bonding CAD/CAM materials with current adhesive systems: An overview. Saudi Dent J. 2022 May;34(4):259-269. [Crossref]
3. Freitas JS, Souza LFB, Dellazzana FZ, Tamires da Silva, Ribeiro L, Pereira GK et al. Advanced lithium disilicate: A comparative evaluation of translucency and fatigue failure load to other ceramics for monolithic restorations. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2023 Dec;148:106192. [PubMed]
4. Yanakiev S, Yordanov B, Marinova-Takorova M. Hydrofluoric acid etching patterns and surface morphology of three silica-based ceramic materials. J of IMAB 2022 Jan-Mar;28(1):4325-4329. [Crossref]
5.   Cinar S, Altan B, Akgungor G. Comparison of Bond Strength of Monolithic CAD-CAM Materials to Resin Cement Using Different Surface Treatment Methods. J Adv Oral Res. 2019; 10(2):120-127. [Crossref]
6.   Georgiadou G, Kouros P, Dionysopoulos D, Mourouzis P, Talidis K. Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Resin Cement on the Surface of a Lithium Disilicate Glass-Ceramic Restorative Material after Various Surface Treatments. Appl Sci. 2023; 13(21):11927. [Crossref]
7.   Rohr N, Martin S, Zitzmann NU, Fischer J. A comprehensive in vitro study on the performance of two different strategies to simplify adhesive bonding. J Esthet Restor Dent 2022;34(5):833-842. [PubMed]
8.   Heboyan A, Vardanyan A, Karobari MI, Anand M , Avagyan T, Tebyaniyan H, et al. Dental luting cements: an updated comprehensive review. Molecules 2023 Feb 8;28(4):1619. [PubMed]
9.   Calheiros-Lobo MJ, Carbas R, da Silva LFM, Pinho T. Impact of in vitro findings on clinical protocols for the adhesion of CAD-CAM blocks: A systematic integrative review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2022; 19:S0022-3913(22)00551-0. [PubMed]
10. Del Bianco F, Mazzitelli C, Maravic T, Josic U, Florenzano F, Baldissara P et al. Bond Strength to Lithium-Disilicate Ceramic after Different Surface Cleaning Approaches. J Adhes Dent 2024;26(1):11-18. [PubMed]
11. Pimentel de Oliveira R, de Paula BL, Ribeiro ME, et al. Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Self-Etching Adhesive Systems Containing HEMA and 10-MDP Monomers: Bond Strength of Adhesives Containing HEMA and 10-MDP. Int J Dent 2022; Jun 10;2022:5756649. [PubMed]
12. Takahashi N, Kurokawa H, Wakamatsu K, Hirokane E, Takamizawa T, Miyazaki M et al. Bonding ability of resin cements to different types of CAD/CAM composite blocks. Dent Mater J 2022 Feb 1;41(1):134-141. [PubMed]
13. Lu Y, Bierman TE, Dal Piva AMO, Tribst JPM, Feilzer AJ, Kleverlaan CJ. Effect of Surface Treatment and Resin Cement on the Bond Strength of an Advanced Lithium Disilicate. Eur J Dent 2024 Jul;18(3):869-876. [PubMed ]
14. Jäggi M, Karlin S, Zitzmann NU,  Rohr N. Shear bond strength of universal adhesives to human enamel and dentin. J Esthet Restor Dent2024 May;36(5):804-812. [PubMed]
15. Tribst JP, Diamantino PJ, de Freitas MR, Tanaka IV, Silva-Concílio LR, de Melo RM, et al. Effect of active application of self-etching ceramic primer on the long- term bond strength of different dental CAD/CAM materials. J Clin Exp Dent 2021 Nov 1;13(11):e1089–e1095. [PubMed]
16. Irie M, Okada M, Maruo Y, Nishigawa G, Matsumoto T. Shear Bond Strength of Resin Luting Materials to Lithium Disilicate Ceramic: Correlation between Flexural Strength and Modulus of Elasticity. Polymers(Basel). 2023 Feb 23;15(5):1128. [PubMed]
17. Malysa A, Wezgowiec J, Grzebieluch W,   Danel DP , Wieckiewicz M . Effect of thermocycling on the bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements used for luting CAD/CAM ceramics to human dentin. Int J Mol Sci 2022 Jan 11;23(02):745. [PubMed]
18. Kemaloglu H, Cay O, Devrimci EE, Pamir T. Repair bond strength of a new self-adhesive composite resin to three different resin-matrix ceramic CAD-CAM materials. Dent Mater J. 2024 Mar 29;43(2):137-145. [PubMed]
19. Uğur M, Kavut İ, Tanrıkut ÖO, Cengiz Ö. Effect of ceramic primers with different chemical contents on the shear bond strength of CAD/CAM ceramics with resin cement after thermal ageing. BMC Oral Health 2023 Jan 11;23(1):210. [PubMed]
20. Ashy LM, Marghalani H. Internal and marginal adaptation of adhesive resin cements used for luting inlay restorations: an in vitro micro-CT study. Materials (Basel). 2022 Sep 5;15(17):6161. [PubMed]
21. Maqbool B, Rego HMC, Santos GC Jr, Ari N, Santos MJMC. Effect of different surface treatment protocols on the bond strength between lithium disilicate and resin cements. Odontology. 2024 Jan;112(1):74-82. [PubMed]

Received: 26 January 2025
Published online: 08 July 2025

back to Online Journal