head JofIMAB
Journal of IMAB - Annual Proceeding (Scientific Papers)
Publisher: Peytchinski Publishing Ltd.
ISSN: 1312-773X (Online)
Issue: 2025, vol. 31, issue4
Subject Area: Medicine
-
DOI: 10.5272/jimab.2025314.6567
Published online: 28 October 2025

Original article
J of IMAB. 2025 Oct-Dec;31(4):6567-6571
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DENTAL INDICES: BULGARIAN AND SOME INTERNATIONAL POPULATIONS
Zdravka HarizanovaORCID logoCorresponding Autoremail, Zlatizara TodorovaORCID logo,
Department of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, Bulgaria.

ABSTRACT:
Purpose. Dental indices are ratios between the absolute sizes of the teeth: mesiodistal, vestibulolingual, and height of the dental crown. They characterize the shape and size of the teeth, providing an option for measurements of rotated or compressed teeth. Тhis study aims to explore the degree of their population specificity between Bulgarian and other population.
Material and Method. The study included 311 Bulgarians aged 20 – 40 years. Vestibulolingual and mesiodistal dimensions of teeth were measured. The crown module for maxillary teeth and the crown index for mandibular teeth were calculated.
Results. We found that the crown module did not exhibit a statistically significant difference between Bulgarians and the other populations. However, the differences in the crown index of lower molars were statistically significant. Mean values in Bulgarians were higher, except for the Iranians, who showed greater mean values.
Conclusion. Therefore, we think the crown index may contribute to differentiating Bulgarians from other populations. Specific dimensions for our population need to be defined.

Keywords: Bulgarians, dental indices, crown index, crown module, population specificity,

pdf - Download FULL TEXT /PDF 854 KB/
Please cite this article as: Harizanova Z, Todorova Z. Comparative analysis of dental indices: Bulgarian and some international populations. J of IMAB. 2025 Oct-Dec;31(4):6567-6571. [Crossref - 10.5272/jimab.2025314.6567]

Corresponding AutorCorrespondence to: Zdravka Harizanova, Department of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University – Plovdiv; 15A Vasil Aprilov Blvd., 4000, Plovdiv, Bulgaria; E-mail: zdravka.harizanova@mu-plovdiv.bg

REFERENCES:
1. Kaplan JB, Bennett T, Use of race and ethnicity in biomedical publication. JAMA. 2003 May 28;289(20):2709-16. [PubMed]
2. Mayhall JT, Saunders SR, Belier PL, The dental morphology of North American whites: a reappraisal. In: Kurtén B, editor. Teeth: form, function, and evolution. New York: Columbia University Press. 1982, p. 245-258.
3. Townsend G, Yamada H, Smith P. Expression of the entoconulid (sixth cusp) on mandibular molar teeth of an Australian aboriginal population. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1990 Jul;82(3):267-74. [PubMed]
4. Risch N, Burchard E, Ziv E, Tang H. Categorization of humans in biomedical research: genes, race and disease. Genome Biol. 2002 Jul 1;3(7):comment2007. [PubMed]
5. Townsend GC, Martin NG. Fitting genetic models to Carabelli trait data in South Australian twins. J Dent Res. 1992 Feb;71(2):403-9. [PubMed]
6. Hanihara T, Ishida H. Metric dental variation of major human populations. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2005 Oct;128(2):287-98. [PubMed]
7. Hanihara K, Distances between Australian aborigines and certain other populations based on dental measurements J Human Evolution. 1977 May;6(4):403-418. [Crossref]
8. Irish JD, Morez A, Girdland Flink L, Phillips ELW, Scott GR. Do dental non-metric traits actually work as proxies for neutral genomic data? Some answers from continental- and global-level analyses. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2020 Jul;172(3):347–375. [PubMed]
9. Rathmann H, Reyes-Centeno H. Testing the utility of dental morphological trait combinations for inferring human neutral genetic variation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 May 19;117(20):10769-10777. [PubMed]
10. Dumančić J, Scott GR, Savić Pavičin I, Anić-Milošević S, Medančić N et al. Crown Sexual Dimorphism in a Sample of the Modern Croatian Population. Dent J. 2023; 11(7):175-182 [Crossref]
11. Akdemir S, Ergin Tokgöz S, Kurt E, Bilhan H. Determination of intercanine distance from a proportion calculation: A pilot clinical study. J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Dec;130(6):885-888. [PubMed]
12. Harizanova Z, Baltadjiev A, Yordanova M, Popova F, Peycheva M. Inter-Incisive Index in Bulgarians and its Application in Dentistry. Int J Morphol. 2022; 40(3):706-710. [Crossref]
13. Townsend GC. Tooth size characteristics of Australian aborigines. Occas Pap Hum Biol. 1979; 1:17-38.
14. Mayhall JT, Saunders SR, Belier PL, The dental morphology of North American whites: a reappraisal. In: Kurtén B, editor. Teeth: form, function, and evolution. New York: Columbia University Press. 1982. 245–258.
15. Townsend G, Yamada H, Smith P. Expression of the entoconulid (sixth cusp) on mandibular molar teeth of an Australian aboriginal population. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1990; 82:267-274.
16. Harizanova Z, Baltadjiev A, Yordanova M, Ahmed-Popova F, Boyaci E. Application of odontometric dimensions of molars in sex assessment in Bulgarians. Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2022 Oct 31;64(5):793-798. [PubMed]
17. Yordanov Y, Uzunov K, Fakih H. [Manual in anatomy and anthropology for dentists.] 1st edition. Artgraf, Sofia. 2012; 248–258. [in Bulgarian].
18. Jernvall J, Keränen SV, Thesleff I. Evolutionary modification of development in mammalian teeth: quantifying gene expression patterns and topography. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Dec 19;97(26):14444-8. [PubMed]
19. Lavelle CLB. Maxillary and mandibular tooth size in different racial groups and in different occlusal categories, Am J Orthodontics. 1972 Jan;61(1):29-37

Received: 10 July 2025
Published online: 28 October 2025

back to Online Journal