 |
Publisher: Peytchinski Publishing Ltd.
ISSN: 1312-773X (Online)
Issue: 2025, vol. 31, issue4
Subject Area: Public Health
-
DOI: 10.5272/jimab.2025314.6640
Published online: 03 December 2025
Original article
J of IMAB. 2025 Oct-Dec;31(4):6640-6645
DIDACTIC APPROACHES TO PRECLINICAL E-TESTING FOR MEDICAL STUDENTS
Ilina Doykova
,
Department of Foreign Language Teaching, Communication and Sports, Medical University – Varna, Bulgaria.
ABSTRACT:
There are three specific and key unknowns to e-testing didactics (e-testing) that distinguish it from traditional test didactics and must be addressed in the preparation of electronic tests: (1) does it test the one it needs to test (security), (2) does it test what it needs to test (validity), and (3) does it use the most appropriate tools (design). E-test didactics emerges as a distinct field combining classical test theory with contemporary digital methodologies. It entails the science of theoretical and practical teaching of assessment forms supported by e-learning platforms and test-generation software, with emphasis on objective, valid, and standardized procedures. Instructors must be trained to align assessment content with learning objectives, utilize platform functionalities effectively, and construct test items that support reliable evaluation of knowledge and skills. Our case study at Medical University – Varna illustrates the benefits and challenges of implementing e-testing in preclinical disciplines. The transition from conventional to digital assessment revealed discrepancies between teaching content and assessment tools, arising primarily from mismatches in content mapping, constraints imposed by platform functionalities, and the demand for systematic didactic training when switching from traditional paper-based tests to their digital counterparts. Despite that the study highlights the advantages of e-assessment for students and faculty: increased efficiency, immediate feedback, greater objectivity in grading, and analytical insight through digital tracking and data analysis. Common task types used in preclinical e-testing, such as multiple-choice, matching, and cloze tests, demonstrate how e-tests can measure not only factual recall but also application and comprehension. The findings suggest that e-testing, when pedagogically grounded, enhances assessment quality and supports the evolving needs of higher education.
Keywords: E-assessment, E-didactics, Test items, Quality criteria,
- Download FULL TEXT /PDF 2210 KB/
Please cite this article as: Doykova I. Didactic Approaches to Preclinical E-testing for Medical Students. J of IMAB. 2025 Oct-Dec;31(4):6640-6645. [Crossref - 10.5272/jimab.2025314.6640]
Correspondence to: llina Doykova, Department of Foreign Language Teaching, Communication and Sports, Medical University - Varna; 55, Marin Drinov Str., Varna 9002, Bulgaria; E-mail: Ilina.Doykova@mu-varna.bg
REFERENCES:
1. Mate K, Weidenhofer J. Considerations and strategies for effective online assessment with a focus on the biomedical sciences. FASEB Bioadv. 2021 Oct 25;4(1):9-21. [PubMed]
2.Effective Practice with e-Assessment: An overview of technologies, policies and practice in further and higher education. JISC. 2007; p.6. [Internet]
3. [2.2 Possible uses of the term "assessment".] [in German] In: E-Assessment. Application Scenarios and Experiences at Universities.] Ruedel C, Mandel S. (eds.) Münster et al.: Waxmann. 2010; p.14. [Internet]
4. Crisp G. The E-Assessment Handbook. Bloomsbury Academic. 5. 09. 2007. 273p. [Internet]
5. Shrivastava SR, Shrivastava PS. Capacity building of teachers to conduct fair online assessments. Indian J Anaest. 2024 Jan;68(1):121-2. [PubMed]
6. Chan JC, Ahn D. Unproctored online exams provide meaningful assessment of student learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Aug;120(31):e2302020120. [PubMed]
7. Xiromeriti M, Newton PM. Solving not answering. Validation of guidance for writing higher-order multiple-choice questions in medical science education. Med Sci Educ. 2024 Dec;34(6):1469-77. [PubMed]
8. Ramakishnan SB, Ramadoss B. Assessment using multi-criteria decision approach for "higher order skills" learning domains. Int J E-Learning. 2009 Apr;8(2):241-262. [Internet]
9. Ali S, Ali SMH, Saeed H, Chaudhry MF, Khalil J, Ahsen NF. Navigating the Transition to Remote Online Examinations in Undergraduate Medical Education in a Resource-Limited Setting: A Student Satisfaction and Perception Analysis. Cureus. 2025 May 20;17(5):e84480. [PubMed]
Received: 28 July 2025
Published online: 03 December 2025