head JofIMAB
Journal of IMAB - Annual Proceeding (Scientific Papers)
Publisher: Peytchinski Publishing Ltd.
ISSN: 1312-773X (Online)
Issue: 2026, vol. 32, issue2
Subject Area: Public Health
-
DOI: 10.5272/jimab.2026322.6818
Published online: 20 April 2026

Original article
J of IMAB. 2026 Apr-Jun;32(2):6818-6821
IMPACT OF CHANGES IN THE ORGANIZATION OF WORK ON QUALITY OF LIFE
Rositsa MarkovaORCID logoCorresponding Autoremail, Marina Samuneva-ZhelyabovaORCID logo, Karolina LuybomirovaORCID logo,
Department of Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University-Sofia, Bulgaria.

ABSTRACT:
Introduction: The ongoing digitalization is affecting not only how work is organized, but also the health of employees. A safe and healthy working environment is vital for overall sustainability, as it affects opportunities for economic and social development.
Material and methods. A subjective study was conducted, and mixed groups comprising 499 people from the following professions were surveyed: administrative student staff, groups of employers, occupational health services, computer technology professionals, insurers, and pharmacists. A sociological method was used—a questionnaire. The results of the study are presented using descriptive statistics, the Chi-square test, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, and the Mann-Whitney test to compare two groups and check the normality of the distribution of quantitative data.
Results. The gender distribution of participants is as follows: 228 participants are men and 271 are women, according to the percentage distribution - 45.7% men and 54.3% women. Employees who work from home visit the office as follows: 54.7% once a month, and 45.3% more than once a month. The results show that most of the respondents did not receive assistance in relocating their workplace during the pandemic. 78.4% of them answered negatively, while 21.6% received assistance in organizing the work process.
Conclusion. This study examines the impact of work organization on quality of life in the post-COVID-19 pandemic period. Further studies are needed to better characterize how the organization of work—such as job tasks, workflows, and potential overlaps between occupational and community exposures.

Keywords: Remote Working, Flexible Workplace, Hybrid Working, Employee Health,

pdf - Download FULL TEXT /PDF 906 KB/
Please cite this article as: Markova R, Samuneva-Zhelyabova M, Luybomirova K. Impact of changes in the organization of work on quality of life. J of IMAB. 2026 Apr-Jun;32(2):6818-6821. [Crossref - 10.5272/jimab.2026322.6818]

Corresponding AutorCorrespondence to: Rositsa Markova, Department of Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University – Sofia; 8, Bialo more Str., Sofia, Bulgaria; E-mail: r.markova@foz.mu-sofia.bg

REFERENCES:
1. Working Time and Work-Life Balance Around the World. Geneva: International Labour Office. 2022. [Internet]
2. [Law on Healthy and Safe Working Conditions.] [in Bulgarian] Supplemented by SG No. 27 of 29 March 2024. [Internet]
3. Ahrendt D, Cabrita J, Clerici E, Hurley J, Leončikas T, Mascherini M, et al.  Living, working and COVID-19: First findings. Eurofound. April 2020 [Internet]
4.  Ahrendt D, Mascherini M, Leoncikas T, Sandor E. Living, working and COVID-19: First findings – April 2020. Eurofound. 6 May 2020. [Internet]
5. Al-Mohamed AA, Al-Mohamed S, Alebrahem M. The remote revolution: assessing the impact of working from home on finance professionals.  Futur Bus J. 2024;10:94. [Internet]
6. Arata S, Masaki Sugiuchi, Shun Kawakubo. Office environment and workers’ productivity in the era of hybrid work: analysis considering office environment and home environment. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 2024; 1363 012112. [Crossref]  
7.[Labour Code. Chapter V, VIII(b).] [in Bulgarian] Amended by SG No. 115 of December 30, 2025, [Internet]
8.  Messenger J, Llave OV, Gschwind L, Boehmer S, Vermeylen G, Wilkens M. Working anytime, anywhere: The effects on the world of work. Eurofound. 15 Feb 2017. [Internet]
9. Adriel MAR, Farronan EVR, Garcia EVR, Ijiri GLC, Bravo-Jaico JL, Vásquez AMM, et al. Telework for a Sustainable Future: Systematic Review of Its Contribution to Global Corporate Sustainability (2020–2024). Sustainability. 2025 Jun 22;17(13):5737. [Crossref]
10. Ahrendt D, Anderson R, Dubois H, Jungblut JM, Leončikas T, Sándor E, et al. European Quality of Life Survey 2016. Europaeu. 23 Jan, 2018. [Internet]
11. Arvola R, Kristjuhan Ü. Workload and health of older academic personnel using telework. Agron Res. 2015;13:741–9.
12. Barrero JM, Bloom N, Davis SJ. The Evolution of Work from Home. J Economic Perspect. 2023 Fall;37(4):23-50. [Internet

Received: 12 September 2025
Published online: 20 April 2026

back to Online Journal